Following up on last week’s post about the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R. v. National Post, 2010 SCC 16, Cris Best, writing at The Court.ca, has an in-depth analysis of the decision.
R v National Post Redux
About Bob Tarantino
Bob Tarantino is Counsel at Dentons Canada LLP and focuses his practice on the interface between the entertainment industries and intellectual property law, with an emphasis on film and television production, financing, licensing, distribution, and IP acquisition and protection. His clients range from artists and independent producers to Canadian distributors and foreign studios and financiers at every stage of the creative process, from development to delivery and exploitation.
RELATED POSTS
Prohibiting Online Impersonations – California and Canada
California recently added a new section (Section 528.5) to their Penal Code which makes it a criminal offence to knowingly […]
R v National Post – Case-by-case Privilege for Journalists and Confidential Sources
On Friday, May 7, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision in R. v. National Post, 2010 SCC […]
CBSC Delivers Revised “Money for Nothing” Decision
On August 31, 2011, the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC), the private body which administers the codes of standards and […]